always baffled me, because I'd never had a reason to believe that it was dangerous. I always heard plenty of sirens and knew there were supposed "bad" sections of the city, but that was all very abstract to me. When I was eight years old, we moved about 15 minutes away to the more affluent and demographically white
suburbs. Despite the close proximity between the suburbs and the
city, the conditions of living are vastly superior and there is minimal
interaction with or acknowledgement of Chester. When my new classmates talked about the city, it was usually to remark that you might get shot if you went there and when I told them that I used to live there, I was usually met with disbelief. For the majority of my schooling, when racism and race differences were mentioned it was usually the white washed history, in which slavery was emphasized and the civil rights movement was superficially covered.We were taught that Martin Luther King Jr. had a dream and that dream came true. Racism was approached as an individual moral problem and it wasn't until later in high school that we discussed racism as a system and ideology. Subtle racism was was definitely all around us, but never acknowledged unless it was expressed in an overt way.
I found the first chapter of the book really interesting, because so often race is accepted as a logical, concrete thing. We don't often interrogate our language and how it structures every day social interactions. What's more, although race is an invention with inconsistencies in terms of who fits what category globally, it still has a very real impact in terms of power relations and social goods. I thought it related well to what we briefly talked about in class, when we touched on how Irish and Italians were originally discriminated when they began emigrating to the United States, until they were eventually assimilated into the "white" category. It seems that humans always desire to partition the world around them, particularly when it comes to the concept of us vs. them in order to validate their particular way of life.
How do you think CIE handles race?
ReplyDeleteAlthough we read The Reluctant Fundamentalist, we talked about this book more in terms of religious discrimination, although it dealt with both religious and racial discrimination. I don't think we really interrogated the concepts of race or the systemic and institutionalized aspects of race. In fact, I learned more about this in my Environmental Justice class. I think it'd be crucial to go deeper with race in CIE and add a book such as Racism without Racists or The New Jim Crow to the curriculum
ReplyDelete